GEORGIA BALLOT CHALLENGE APPEAL UPDATE ~ Pixel Patriot

MALEVOLENT FORCES HAVE STOLEN

THE

SANCTITY OF THE BALLOT

APPEAL IN PROGRESS
DESTINATION: U.S. SUPREME COURT

Georgia Ballot Challenge Legal Defense Fund

The case Kevin Richard Powell v. Barack Obama and the other Georgia ballot challenge cases are different from all of the previous cases in that the judge DENIED Obama’s Motion to Dismiss. Therefore, this case cannot be compared to any of the previous cases because the merits of the case were presented in open court before Judge Michael Malihi. Subsequently, the FACTS with regard to Barack Obama’s “natural-born Citizen” status and non-compliance with Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution as required for the Office of the President of the United States were entered into the court record. However, Obama ignored the subpoena requiring his attendance to the judicial proceeding where neither he nor his attorney even showed up and then his attorney sent an email directly to the Georgia Secretary of State asking him to just cancel the hearing, a move which is completely against the established “rules” of the court.

In an incomprehensible turn of events, Judge Malihi ultimately rewarded Obama’s astounding display of contempt for the court and his attempt to subvert the U.S. Constitution and “Rule of Law” by finding Obama eligible for the ballot even though he entered nothing into the record to prove his eligibility.

Pursuant to Georgia election law O.C.G.A. 21-2-5(a):

(a) Every candidate for federal and state office who is certified by the state executive committee of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.

Malihi relied upon a non-binding advisory opinion from an Indiana State case over a U.S. Supreme Court case which has held binding precedent since 1875 to “consider” Obama’s eligibility. In effect his recommendation would signify that the U.S. Constitution as he “considers” it would allow the child of a terrorist with dual allegiance to be President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces.

With great foresight and deliberate resolve, the Founders explicitly crafted the requirement of “natural-born Citizen” as a safeguard to guarantee protection for the nation against foreign influence.

The extant implications are so far-reaching they belie all reason and can’t be ignored. The foundations of our government made up of three equal branches have been totally undermined such that the Judiciary either can’t or won’t enforce the U.S. Constitution which is the “Law of the Land.”

The dangers posed to the Republic are profoundly grave. At best the Judiciary is of no effect upon an unchecked Executive branch, and at worst the Judiciary is complicit in the total destruction of the Constitution leaving tyranny in its wake.

This is not a theoretical exposition. While these United States are supposed to comprise a representative Republic, the fact remains Malevolent Forces have stolen the sanctity of the ballot to illegitimately usurp the highest seat of power with impunity while officials in positions of trust have turned a blind eye and abrogated their responsibility to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies both foreign AND DOMESTIC.

These enemies of freedom have plotted a course for the nation that will impact, if not control every aspect of your life against your will including your immutable God given rights.

We must challenge these Malevolent Forces girded by TRUTH and the armour of righteousness.

Represented by J. Mark Hatfield of Hatfield & Hatfield P.C., Waycross, GA; this Georgia Ballot Challenge case now advances in the appeals process all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary. Your financial support is greatly needed at this time. No amount is too small or too large.
Donations can be made here:

Georgia Ballot Challenge Legal Defense Fund

https://secure.piryx.com/donate/Owri7yAp/Article-II-Legal-Defense-Fund

Updates on the case Kevin Richard Powell v. Barack Obama can be found here: