MISSION STATEMENT

This website is dedicated as a place where fellow Americans may convene to share in the celebration of the magnificent heritage of our great nation. We recognize the need for eternal vigilance to defend against the constant threat from those who seek to undermine our God given rights as so eloquently inscribed by our Founders into the nation’s founding charter, the United States Constitution.

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

OBAMA 2012 BALLOT CHALLENGE IN GEORGIA


BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II ELIGIBILITY CHALLENGED IN GEORGIA
FOR 2012 PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE PRIMARY


Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 11:59 PM
Subject: Formal Complaint

Dear Mr. Kemp,

As the Secretary of State for the Great State of Georgia in accordance with the
Constitution of the State of Georgia; you had to qualify for the position you now hold.
For the record I will respectfully remind you it can be found in the State Constitution:

Georgia State Constitution  Article V, Section III, Paragraph II
Qualifications. (a) No person shall be eligible to the office of the Secretary of State, Attorney General, State School Superintendent, Commissioner of Insurance, Commissioner of Agriculture, or Commissioner of Labor unless such person shall have been a citizen of the United States for ten years and a legal resident of the state for four years immediately preceding election or appointment and shall have attained the age of 25 years by the date of assuming office.

And just as you had to qualify for office before you could be elected, so too does the President of the United States.  The qualifications for the Office of the President of the United States are in Article II of the U.S. Constitution:

U.S. Constitution  Article II, Section I, Clause V
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

As the Chief Elections Official for the State of Georgia it is your responsibility to supervise the elections process and guarantee the sanctity of the ballot.

In order to assure that you comply with this responsibility, the Georgia State Constitution stipulates that you had to take an oath to faithfully discharge your duties.

And might I also respectfully remind you that the United States Constitution, which is the law of the land; affirms that you are bound by that oath to support the U.S. Constitution:

U.S. Const. Article 6 Clause 3
Clause 3: The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

Nowhere in the Constitution does it grant you the discretion to pick and choose which parts to uphold and which parts to ignore.

I would like to refer to a statement by The Honorable Sean Jerguson, Georgia Representative Dist. 22:

 “I think we can all agree that we are a nation of laws, and we are governed by a nation of laws, and those laws are based on a framework and a foundation called the Constitution.”

Mr. Kemp, you are duty bound to guarantee that only a natural born Citizen as enumerated in Article II of the U.S. Constitution be allowed on the ballot in the Presidential election in 2012.

John Jay, our nation’s first Chief Justice in a letter on July 25, 1787 to George Washington; who at the time was presiding over the Constitutional Convention; said:

“Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government; and to declare expressly that the command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen.”

And The U.S. Supreme Court in 1874 defined “Natural Born Citizen” in Minor v. Happersett as children born of two parents who are United States citizens:

"The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners."

The findings of the Supreme Court in 1874 was unanimous; with no dissention or opposition among the Justices as to the findings, and the definition has not changed.

Barack Hussein Obama II has publicly admitted his father Barack Obama Sr. was a Kenyan native and a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948.  Barack Obama Sr. never became a U.S citizen. Therefore, Barack Hussein Obama II is not now and never can be a natural born Citizen of the United States by virtue of his recognized allegiance to a sovereign foreign nation inherited from his father precluding him from eligibility for the Office of the President of the United States.  Therefore, according to Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of the United States Constitution as defined in the United States Supreme Court case of Minor v. Happerset 88 U.S. 162 (1874) which set binding precedent, the Office of the President of the United States was usurped by an ineligible candidate.

Therefore, I am officially filing a formal complaint as to Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility and request you remove him from the ballot.

Respectfully,
Kevin R. Powell


Additional challenges in Georgia have been published here:

Saturday, November 12, 2011

TOP SECRET DECLASSIFIED DOCUMENT VINDICATES LTC TERRENCE LAKIN



DECLASSIFIED JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF EMERGENCY ALERT SYSTEM
VERIFIES SOLE PRESIDENTIAL AUTHORITY
By Pixel Patriot
November 12, 2011



On Wednesday, November 9th at 2:00 PM EST, FEMA and the FCC conducted the first ever nationwide test of the Emergency Alert System designed to allow the President to address the American people during a national emergency.  Featuring a live "presidential" alert code, the test instructed TV and radio stations that the alert took priority over all other programming.


According to FEMA’s mission:
FEMA’s mission is to support our citizens and first responders to ensure that as a nation we work together to build, sustain, and improve our capability to prepare for, protect against, respond to, recover from, and mitigate all hazards.


However, there is no mention as to EMERGCON


From Wikipedia:
EMERGCON (Emergency Condition) is a state of readiness that is separate from DEFCON, or defense readiness condition used by the United States, in that it incorporates civilian measures in addition to the DEFCON military measures.

Generally, EMERGCONs are a state of readiness following an ICBM (intercontinental ballistic missile) attack. Other forces go to DEFCON 1 during EMERGCONs. There are two types of EMERGCONs:

           Defense Emergency: A major hostile attack on United States and/or allied forces overseas, and/or an overt action made against the United States. This must be confirmed by a unified commander or higher authority.

           Air Defense Emergency: A major hostile attack by aircraft or missiles seems probable, is imminent, or is taking place on the continental United States, Canada, or Greenland. This declaration is made by the Commander of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD).



Although the United States military has gone into defense readiness various times (such as the Cuban Missile Crisis), it has never had a major EMERGCON.




This TOP SECRET document (declassified) called Emergency Action Procedures of the Joint Chiefs of Staff was the preparedness manual for their Emergency Alert System published in 1981.




The Defense Emergency condition, or EMERGCON is assigned the code name “HOT BOX”.

Page 36


This Emergency Alert System for the Joint Chiefs of Staff defines the hierarchy of the Chain-of-Command…

Page 28


Although the Chain-of-Command answers to the Commander-in-Chief, the government itself; by the People, of the People, and for the People; derives its authority from the consent of the governed.

And “We the People”, the sovereign authority of these United States find ourselves facing many national security threats due to our elected Representatives not upholding their oath, encroaching on our God given unalienable rights and liberties with impunity and no longer recognizing the will of the people.


“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.— That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed”


Preamble to the U.S. Constitution -
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America”


John Jay, our nation’s first Chief Justice in a letter on July 25, 1787 to George Washington; who at the time was presiding over the Constitutional Convention; said:

“Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government; and to declare expressly that the command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen.”


Barack Hussein Obama II has publicly admitted his father Barack Obama Sr. was a Kenyan native and a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948.  Barack Obama Sr. never became a U.S citizen. Therefore, Barack Hussein Obama II is not now and never can be a natural born Citizen of the United States by virtue of his recognized allegiance to a sovereign foreign nation inherited from his father precluding him from eligibility for the Office of the President of the United States.  Therefore, according to Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of the United States Constitution as defined in the United States Supreme Court case of Minor v. Happerset 88 U.S. 162 (1874) which set binding precedent, the Office of the President of the United States was usurped by an ineligible candidate.




No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.


On January 20th, 2009 a usurper became the putative President of the United States casting our nation into a Constitutional crisis.  Though the ramifications are seemingly incalculable, it is self-evident that if Barack Obama is given a pass from justice when history tells us it can and should be blind; then the Rule of Law and the Constitution as the bedrock of our Republic will be utterly meaningless. 


The TRUTH remains TRUE even if it falls on deaf ears and a blind eye.


Thomas Jefferson in his First Inaugural Address extolled the necessity of Equal and exact justice to all men



Even more grave still, Barack Obama having yet to conclusively prove his eligibility and facing challenges with hundreds of military plaintiffs, notwithstanding none had yet to be heard on the merits of the case; on December 1st, 2009 announced at West Point Academy that as Commander of the U.S. Armed Forces he was sending an additional 30,000 troops to Afghanistan on his orders.


The specter of a putative President sending a soldier to take the life of another without a legitimate Constitutional mandate weighed heavily on the heart, mind and conscience of a great many honorable men and women serving their country in the military.  The moral quagmire and breach of trust beset upon the military officers sworn to defend the Constitution became too great to continue and could not be ignored.  The line in the sand had to be drawn.


LTC Terrence Lakin, a highly decorated 18 year Army officer and lead Flight Surgeon charged with caring for Army Chief of Staff General Casey's pilots and air crew tried every way he could through the channels in his Chain-of-Command to seek proof of Obama’s eligibility.


At every turn he was denied.


LTC Terrence Lakin invited his own court-martial in an effort to know with certainty that the orders coming from the Commander-in-Chief are in fact valid. 

An officer’s oath is different from the oath of enlistment.


The oath of enlistment:

"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).


The oath for commissioned officers:

"I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God." (DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)



The officer does not swear to obey the orders of the President.  A U.S. military officer’s allegiance is to the U.S. Constitution and is obligated to defend it against all enemies both foreign AND DOMESTIC; which would include a Presidential Usurper.


LTC Terry Lakin was Court-Martialed because Army Colonel Judge Denise R. Lind ruled that orders in the Chain-of-Command stopped at the Pentagon.


However, on page 99 of the Emergency Alert System for the Joint Chiefs of Staff is irrefutable proof that lawful orders directed through the Chain-of-Command derive their authority at times ONLY from the President.


Page 99


On any given day, orders may be directed from the President and Commander-in-Chief through the Secretary of Defense (10 U.S.C. § 113 (b)), the Joint Chiefs of Staff (10 U.S.C. § 153 (a)), or even during emergency response procedures which has a direct impact on the civilian population.  Therefore, an ineligible Presidency would surely qualify as an EMERGCON and an overt attack against the United States of America.


The irony of the nation and its citizens undergoing a national alert drill while every level of government is abrogating its responsibility to uphold their oath to the U.S. Constitution and the Rule of Law is reprehensible.




With Americans across the country armed with a mountain of evidence that Barack Hussein Obama II is not a natural born Citizen and has committed both fraud and forgery by releasing fake birth certificates and using a Social Security number issued from CT, a state in which he has never lived; the process of gaining ballot access in 2012 will surely find him in the “HOT BOX.”















 
Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes