OBAMA 2012 BALLOT CHALLENGE IN GEORGIA

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II ELIGIBILITY CHALLENGED IN GEORGIA

FOR 2012 PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE PRIMARY

Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 11:59 PM
Subject: Formal Complaint

Dear Mr. Kemp,

As the Secretary of State for the Great State of Georgia in accordance with the

Constitution of the State of Georgia; you had to qualify for the position you now hold.

For the record I will respectfully remind you it can be found in the State Constitution:

Georgia State Constitution  Article V, Section III, Paragraph II

Qualifications. (a) No person shall be eligible to the office of the Secretary of State, Attorney General, State School Superintendent, Commissioner of Insurance, Commissioner of Agriculture, or Commissioner of Labor unless such person shall have been a citizen of the United States for ten years and a legal resident of the state for four years immediately preceding election or appointment and shall have attained the age of 25 years by the date of assuming office.

And just as you had to qualify for office before you could be elected, so too does the President of the United States.  The qualifications for the Office of the President of the United States are in Article II of the U.S. Constitution:

U.S. Constitution  Article II, Section I, Clause V

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

As the Chief Elections Official for the State of Georgia it is your responsibility to supervise the elections process and guarantee the sanctity of the ballot.

In order to assure that you comply with this responsibility, the Georgia State Constitution stipulates that you had to take an oath to faithfully discharge your duties.

And might I also respectfully remind you that the United States Constitution, which is the law of the land; affirms that you are bound by that oath to support the U.S. Constitution:

U.S. Const. Article 6 Clause 3

Clause 3: The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

Nowhere in the Constitution does it grant you the discretion to pick and choose which parts to uphold and which parts to ignore.

I would like to refer to a statement by The Honorable Sean Jerguson, Georgia Representative Dist. 22:

 “I think we can all agree that we are a nation of laws, and we are governed by a nation of laws, and those laws are based on a framework and a foundation called the Constitution.”

Mr. Kemp, you are duty bound to guarantee that only a natural born Citizen as enumerated in Article II of the U.S. Constitution be allowed on the ballot in the Presidential election in 2012.

John Jay, our nation’s first Chief Justice in a letter on July 25, 1787 to George Washington; who at the time was presiding over the Constitutional Convention; said:

“Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government; and to declare expressly that the command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen.”

And The U.S. Supreme Court in 1874 defined “Natural Born Citizen” in Minor v. Happersett as children born of two parents who are United States citizens:

"The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners."

The findings of the Supreme Court in 1874 was unanimous; with no dissention or opposition among the Justices as to the findings, and the definition has not changed.

Barack Hussein Obama II has publicly admitted his father Barack Obama Sr. was a Kenyan native and a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948.  Barack Obama Sr. never became a U.S citizen. Therefore, Barack Hussein Obama II is not now and never can be a natural born Citizen of the United States by virtue of his recognized allegiance to a sovereign foreign nation inherited from his father precluding him from eligibility for the Office of the President of the United States.  Therefore, according to Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of the United States Constitution as defined in the United States Supreme Court case of Minor v. Happerset 88 U.S. 162 (1874) which set binding precedent, the Office of the President of the United States was usurped by an ineligible candidate.

Therefore, I am officially filing a formal complaint as to Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility and request you remove him from the ballot.

Respectfully,

Kevin R. Powell

Additional challenges in Georgia have been published here:

Read more »

TOP SECRET DECLASSIFIED DOCUMENT VINDICATES LTC TERRENCE LAKIN

DECLASSIFIED JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF EMERGENCY ALERT SYSTEM

VERIFIES SOLE PRESIDENTIAL AUTHORITY

By Pixel Patriot

November 12, 2011

On Wednesday, November 9th at 2:00 PM EST, FEMA and the FCC conducted the first ever nationwide test of the Emergency Alert System designed to allow the President to address the American people during a national emergency.  Featuring a live "presidential" alert code, the test instructed TV and radio stations that the alert took priority over all other programming.

According to FEMA’s mission:

FEMA’s mission is to support our citizens and first responders to ensure that as a nation we work together to build, sustain, and improve our capability to prepare for, protect against, respond to, recover from, and mitigate all hazards.

However, there is no mention as to EMERGCON

From Wikipedia:

EMERGCON (Emergency Condition) is a state of readiness that is separate from DEFCON, or defense readiness condition used by the United States, in that it incorporates civilian measures in addition to the DEFCON military measures.

Generally, EMERGCONs are a state of readiness following an ICBM (intercontinental ballistic missile) attack. Other forces go to DEFCON 1 during EMERGCONs. There are two types of EMERGCONs:

•           Defense Emergency: A major hostile attack on United States and/or allied forces overseas, and/or an overt action made against the United States. This must be confirmed by a unified commander or higher authority.

•           Air Defense Emergency: A major hostile attack by aircraft or missiles seems probable, is imminent, or is taking place on the continental United States, Canada, or Greenland. This declaration is made by the Commander of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD).

Although the United States military has gone into defense readiness various times (such as the Cuban Missile Crisis), it has never had a major EMERGCON.

This TOP SECRET document (declassified) called Emergency Action Procedures of the Joint Chiefs of Staff was the preparedness manual for their Emergency Alert System published in 1981.

The Defense Emergency condition, or EMERGCON is assigned the code name “HOT BOX”.

Page 36

This Emergency Alert System for the Joint Chiefs of Staff defines the hierarchy of the Chain-of-Command…

Page 28

Although the Chain-of-Command answers to the Commander-in-Chief, the government itself; by the People, of the People, and for the People; derives its authority from the consent of the governed.

And “We the People”, the sovereign authority of these United States find ourselves facing many national security threats due to our elected Representatives not upholding their oath, encroaching on our God given unalienable rights and liberties with impunity and no longer recognizing the will of the people.

From the Declaration of Independence -

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.— That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed”

Preamble to the U.S. Constitution -

“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America”

John Jay, our nation’s first Chief Justice in a letter on July 25, 1787 to George Washington; who at the time was presiding over the Constitutional Convention; said:

“Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government; and to declare expressly that the command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen.”

Barack Hussein Obama II has publicly admitted his father Barack Obama Sr. was a Kenyan native and a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948.  Barack Obama Sr. never became a U.S citizen. Therefore, Barack Hussein Obama II is not now and never can be a natural born Citizen of the United States by virtue of his recognized allegiance to a sovereign foreign nation inherited from his father precluding him from eligibility for the Office of the President of the United States.  Therefore, according to Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of the United States Constitution as defined in the United States Supreme Court case of Minor v. Happerset 88 U.S. 162 (1874) which set binding precedent, the Office of the President of the United States was usurped by an ineligible candidate.

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

On January 20th, 2009 a usurper became the putative President of the United States casting our nation into a Constitutional crisis.  Though the ramifications are seemingly incalculable, it is self-evident that if Barack Obama is given a pass from justice when history tells us it can and should be blind; then the Rule of Law and the Constitution as the bedrock of our Republic will be utterly meaningless. 

The TRUTH remains TRUE even if it falls on deaf ears and a blind eye.

Thomas Jefferson in his First Inaugural Address extolled the necessity of “Equal and exact justice to all men”

Even more grave still, Barack Obama having yet to conclusively prove his eligibility and facing challenges with hundreds of military plaintiffs, notwithstanding none had yet to be heard on the merits of the case; on December 1st, 2009 announced at West Point Academy that as Commander of the U.S. Armed Forces he was sending an additional 30,000 troops to Afghanistan on his orders.

The specter of a putative President sending a soldier to take the life of another without a legitimate Constitutional mandate weighed heavily on the heart, mind and conscience of a great many honorable men and women serving their country in the military.  The moral quagmire and breach of trust beset upon the military officers sworn to defend the Constitution became too great to continue and could not be ignored.  The line in the sand had to be drawn.

LTC Terrence Lakin, a highly decorated 18 year Army officer and lead Flight Surgeon charged with caring for Army Chief of Staff General Casey's pilots and air crew tried every way he could through the channels in his Chain-of-Command to seek proof of Obama’s eligibility.

At every turn he was denied.

LTC Terrence Lakin invited his own court-martial in an effort to know with certainty that the orders coming from the Commander-in-Chief are in fact valid. 

An officer’s oath is different from the oath of enlistment.

The oath of enlistment:

"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

The oath for commissioned officers:

"I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God." (DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)

The officer does not swear to obey the orders of the President.  A U.S. military officer’s allegiance is to the U.S. Constitution and is obligated to defend it against all enemies both foreign AND DOMESTIC; which would include a Presidential Usurper.

LTC Terry Lakin was Court-Martialed because Army Colonel Judge Denise R. Lind ruled that orders in the Chain-of-Command stopped at the Pentagon.

However, on page 99 of the Emergency Alert System for the Joint Chiefs of Staff is irrefutable proof that lawful orders directed through the Chain-of-Command derive their authority at times ONLY from the President.

Page 99

On any given day, orders may be directed from the President and Commander-in-Chief through the Secretary of Defense (10 U.S.C. § 113 (b)), the Joint Chiefs of Staff (10 U.S.C. § 153 (a)), or even during emergency response procedures which has a direct impact on the civilian population.  Therefore, an ineligible Presidency would surely qualify as an EMERGCON and an overt attack against the United States of America.

The irony of the nation and its citizens undergoing a national alert drill while every level of government is abrogating its responsibility to uphold their oath to the U.S. Constitution and the Rule of Law is reprehensible.

With Americans across the country armed with a mountain of evidence that Barack Hussein Obama II is not a natural born Citizen and has committed both fraud and forgery by releasing fake birth certificates and using a Social Security number issued from CT, a state in which he has never lived; the process of gaining ballot access in 2012 will surely find him in the “HOT BOX.”

© Pixel Patriot 2011

Read more »

The Internet Archive & NYS BOE Cover-Up Widens

The Internet Archive Now Complicit

in NYS BOE Website Cover-Up

by

Pixel Patriot

10/24/2011

The Internet Archive Changes Computer Code - Now Implicated in NYS BOE Cover-Up
Headquarters of The Internet Archive (San Francisco, CA)

On October 5th, 2011, I published a report detailing how the New York State Board of Elections had embedded computer source code into their website in an ongoing effort to block anyone from seeing previous versions listing the Constitutional eligibility requirements for President of the United States to be a Natural Born Citizen.

Natural Born Citizen requirement for President replaced with just "Born a citizen"

My report also documented how The Internet Archive was violating their own policy governing the accessibility for BLOCKED webpages using the Wayback Machine originating from a government website.

Just 3 days after my report was published, The Internet Archive changed their own source code to give cover for the NYS BOE deceptive practice.

With irrefutable facts exposing this complicit action by The Internet Archive, this can only be seen as a widening of the conspiracy to defraud the voters of the State of New York.

As the New York State Board of Elections is currently a defendant in the case

Strunk v. BOE, et al; (with a preliminary hearing for the NYS BOE order to show cause to change the website to NBC to be heard Tuesday 10-25-11 at 2:15 PM before the Honorable Arthur M. Schack, J.S.C. and the Supreme Court of the State of New York; I was asked by Mr. Strunk to document the facts of this sequence of events in the form of an Affidavit for the court.

What follows is a summary of my Affidavit including a detailed analysis of how I discovered the change in source code for the website of The Internet Archive, a 501c3 organization; and then how I verified it from multiple subject matter experts.  The Affidavit can be read in its entirety here.

Monday, October 3^rd, 2011

I was told by the Plaintiff, Christopher-Earl Strunk that someone was filing a FOIA request with the New York State Board of Elections, which I will further refer to as (NYS BOE); for previous versions of their website.  Mr. Strunk informed me that the part of the BOE website that lists candidate eligibility previously said the Presidential candidate was required to be a Natural Born Citizen.  I did not know that the website previously stated that.  I asked Mr. Strunk if he had personally seen it before it was changed and he said that he had.

While we were still on the phone I went to the website for The Internet Archive service called the Wayback Machine and started looking for previous versions of the Board of Elections website.

Petabox 4 - Fourth Generation Petabox Storage System (650 TeraBytes/Rack)

The Wayback Machine allows users to search through “over 150 billion webpages archived from 1996 to a few months ago.”

I have successfully used the Wayback Machine before with this same method in order to find the telephone number for the Honorable Sean Jerguson, Georgia state representative which had been published on a previous version of his district website.

The result that I got when I entered the URL for the NYS BOE candidate eligibility webpage:

http://liveweb.archive.org/http://www.elections.state.ny.us/RunningOffice.html

into the Wayback Machine on October 3^rd was an error message that said:

“Sorry.  This URL has been excluded from the Wayback Machine.”

(I will refer to this as - EXCLUDED MESSAGE 1)

EXCLUDED MESSAGE 1

I then researched what this error message means and what would generate this error message.  I learned that The Internet Archive actually has policies governing the issuance of both EXCLUDED and BLOCKED error messages as a result of search requests.

I discovered that the NYS BOE could embed what is known as robot.txt into the computer programming source code for their website, and that this would cause the Wayback Machine to generate the EXCLUDED error message that I saw on the 3^rd of October.

Upon learning that such a tactic could be employed by a government website to prevent the public from seeing previous versions of it’s website; I immediately went to the NYS BOE website to view its computer programming source code and found that it did indeed have the robots.txt code embedded.

Robot.txt found in NYS BOE website source code on October 3rd, 2011

I continued my research looking for previous versions of the NYS BOE website and discovered that not only did they have previous versions of their webpages EXCLUDED by the robots.txt but that webpages were actually being BLOCKED at the mirrored site to The Internet Archive in Alexandrina, Egypt.

(I will refer to this as - BLOCKED MESSAGE 2)

BLOCKED MESSAGE 2

Bibliotheca Alexandrina blocking access to previous versions of the NYS BOE website
with historical references to the term Natural Born Citizen as a requirement for President.

According to The Internet Archive exclusion policies, in order for webpages to be BLOCKED; the request had to have been made by the site owner.

Furthermore, the Internet Archive exclusion policy stipulates that “Archivists will exercise best-efforts compliance with applicable court orders” and “Beyond that, as noted in the Library Bill of Rights, ‘Libraries should challenge censorship in the fulfillment of their responsibility to provide information and enlightenment.’

Bibliotheca Alexandrina maintains the only copy and external backup of The Internet Archive

Upon discovering the NYS BOE website’s deceptive practices; I took screen captures of the EXCLUDED and BLOCKED error messages and downloaded the corresponding computer programming source code and then wrote a report and published it online two days later at 7:16 pm on Wednesday October 5^th, 2011 here:

http://pixelpatriot.blogspot.com/2011/10/new-york-state-boe-website-cover-up.html

I will refer to my online report in this Affidavit as Exhibit B.

The day after my report was published online, another website known as the BirtherReport at:  www.ObamaReleaseYourRecords.com  which I will further refer to as (ORYR), published my report on Thursday October 6^th, 2011.

I woke early on Friday October 7^th, 2011 and decided to test the html links to my report as I periodically do.  At 3:25 AM ET, I was unable to access the link to the BLOCKED error.  Since my computer browser did not say it could not display the webpage, I was concerned that it might be a DoS attack on that server in order to prevent others from seeing the BLOCKED error message.

This historic collection is available for free access to

researchers, historians, scholars, and the general public.

It is invaluable to understanding the interactions between people and events.

As defined by the Department of Homeland Security:

http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/tips/ST04-015.html

National Cyber Alert System

Cyber Security Tip ST04-015

What is a denial-of-service (DoS) attack?

In a denial-of-service (DoS) attack, an attacker attempts to prevent legitimate users from accessing information or services. By targeting your computer and its network connection, or the computers and network of the sites you are trying to use, an attacker may be able to prevent you from accessing email, websites, online accounts (banking, etc.), or other services that rely on the affected computer.

The most common and obvious type of DoS attack occurs when an attacker "floods" a network with information. When you type a URL for a particular website into your browser, you are sending a request to that site's computer server to view the page. The server can only process a certain number of requests at once, so if an attacker overloads the server with requests, it can't process your request. This is a "denial of service" because you can't access that site.

Since this time I was not getting any error messages, I wanted confirmation of what I was experiencing so I called the site owner for ORYR and he said he could not access it either nor was he getting any kind of error message from his browser.  After about 5 minutes while we were still talking on the phone, the BLOCKED error message suddenly displayed in the browser on my computer screen and when I told this to ORYR he said the exact same thing happened for him at the exact same time.  He then ran a program called Sitemeter which allows him to see who is accessing his website and he told me that within 10 minutes after I had tried to access the BLOCKED site that the U.S. Department of State was looking at my report on his website ORYR:

  

On Saturday, October 8th I did the same test for the NYS BOE website using the Wayback Machine; however this time I got a different error message.

This time the error message said:

“Hrm.  Wayback Machine doesn’t have that page archived.

Want to search for all archived pages under http://www.elections.state.ny.us/?”

(I will refer to this as - PAGE NOT ARCHIVED MESSAGE 3)

PAGE NOT ARCHIVED MESSAGE 3

Instead of:

“Sorry.  This URL has been excluded from the Wayback Machine.”

(EXCLUDED MESSAGE 1)

The Internet Archive changed their “own” computer code to conceal

EXCLUDED MESSAGE 1 contrary to the Exclusion Policy

Now implicated in NYS BOE cover-up.

I went back to the NYS BOE website and checked the source code and the robots.txt code was still embedded so I knew that The Internet Archive had to have changed their “own” source code.  I was very concerned because this appeared to me to indicate collusion between a 501c3 non-profit organization and the NYS BOE since their code was changed just 3 days after my report was published.

I made screen captures on Saturday October 8^th documenting the fact that by putting the URL for the NYS BOE into The Internet Archive Wayback Machine a different error message was generated.

Additionally, I have also recorded the exact same sequence of steps on videotape, which I will refer to here as Exhibit C; in real-time in order to document as irrefutable proof that a different error message is generated from what was when I published my report. 

After having found that the NYS BOE was engaging in a deceptive manner, I decided to scrutinize the event that I had just experienced at The Internet Archive Wayback Machine website so that I could fully understand and document it.  I took a closer look at the URL in my browser for The Internet Archive error message and I noticed that the URL had an asterisk character “ * “, also known as a wildcard.  I know from my personal experience with computers that this wildcard character is used with search strings to define varying search parameters.   I decided to manually invoke the same search without the wildcard character so I placed the computer curser using my mouse in the URL field and backed up two spaces to remove the asterisk and the preceding forward slash character and hit enter and I instantly got the EXCLUDED error message that I previously did before Saturday:  (EXCLUDED MESSAGE 1).

On Sunday, I consulted with a Certified Microsoft Systems Engineer in order to verify my findings:

William Lolli, MCSE
President of Tech Assist, Inc.
A network consulting company

He downloaded a static record of The Internet Archive website source code and then using special software he also did a live trace of both error messages to confirm that they were both being generated from the same IP address owned by The Internet Archive.  I have included as Exhibit D a printout of his DNS report with the IP trace.  Additionally, here are questions where I was seeking clarification from the DNS report and his responses:

Question:  Would you like to expound on the DNS report or is its main significance that it verifies both domains trace back to the same IP address:  207.241.226.201

Lolli:  “Yes, it simply shows that archive.org traces back to a block of IP addresses-- which is pretty darn big-- 207.241.224.0 - 207.241.239.255, basically 3825 IP addresses are available to their poole.”

Then we both simultaneously went through the same sequence of steps using the NYS BOE URL with the Wayback Machine and we compared the error message that was generated.  He said that the change in results generated by a search for the NYS BOE URL using the Wayback Machine would indicate The Internet Archives had to have changed their own code.

Lolli:  "Web sites generally have front-end webpages that can send input-requests for response-outputs of data to a backend database. The database, then responds with either text or an entire webpage as a response to the query. It is safe to suggest that the archive.org system has more than one database on more than one physical or virtual host [server]. Depending on the URL string, responses are generated from any number of databases; and in this case, probably two."

Lolli:  “By removing the */ from the URL, you are re-directed to another server-host (known as liveweb.archive.org), and a new message page is generated and displayed”

I also consulted with a professional web developer, Ross Arena; to get a second opinion.  He writes computer programs and internet source code for building websites and I contacted him through the online referral service called Odesk at www.odesk.com.

I sent him the original source code from last week and gave him a description of what I experienced.  Then we reviewed these steps again while discussing it over the phone at the same time.  He told me he had noticed a correlation between the
“Show All” button and the (PAGE NOT ARCHIVED MESSAGE 3).

He said that the “Latest” button sends a bot to check the website live.  I asked him why would the source code for the “Latest” button not be a subset of the code for the “Show All” button?  He said that is just the way that the developers of The Internet Archive Wayback Machine chose to do it.

After Mr. Arena explained to me how the “Show All” button is invoking the
(PAGE NOT ARCHIVED MESSAGE 3), I deduced that the “Show All” button is only
searching for indexed webpages and he agreed.

That being the case, I then suggested testing for a connection between the “Latest” button and the first error message I saw last week and when we both tested that, it did generate the first error message: (EXCLUDED MESSAGE 1).

Therefore, Mr. Arena confirms that evidenced in The Internet Archive source code on Line 221 as can be seen in the screenshot referred to as Exhibit E, the ACTION command reverses the result you get when you hit the "Take Me Back" button. It now invokes the ”Show All” button query which displays a PAGE NOT ARCHIVED MESSAGE as opposed to the “Latest” button query which displays the EXCLUDED MESSAGE.



The ACTION COMMAND on LINE 221 reverses the result
from the TAKE ME BAKE button on the Wayback Machine

 

Even though The Internet Archive can’t control when and how an external site implements a robots.txt command to block access to previous versions of their webpages, The Internet Archive does however control the error messages that are generated and displayed by the Wayback Machine when such blocking technology is employed.

By changing their own source code 3 days after a report was published exposing the deceptive practice by the NYS BOE, an error message generated by the Wayback Machine now tells the user that the page they are looking for is NOT ARCHIVED instead of an error message that would highlight the deception by the NYS BOE.  This deceptive action by the Internet Archive implicates the 501c3 organization in the NYS BOE website cover-up because even though the resultant message has changed, the previous versions of the NYS BOE webpages that listed the requirements for President to be a Natural Born Citizen are still being excluded by the Wayback Machine; albeit now undetected.

The Internet Archive stipulates that their Exclusion Policy follows the Oakland Archive Policy and that they respect “robot exclusion headers.”  However, a “blocked site” message generated from the mirrored site in Alexandrina, Egypt would indicate an agreement between The Internet Archive and the NYS BOE, a government entity; and therefore according to their Exclusion Policy the normal course of action would be to “challenge” a request to BLOCK webpages from that same government organization.

Additionally their Exclusion Policy adheres to the Code of Ethics for Archivists:

Founded in 1936, the Society of American Archivists is North America's
oldest and largest national archival professional association.

V. Authenticity and Integrity

“Archivists strive to preserve and protect the authenticity of records in their holdings by documenting their creation and use in hard copy and electronic formats. They have a fundamental obligation to preserve the intellectual and physical integrity of those records.

Archivists may not alter, manipulate, or destroy data or records to conceal facts or distort evidence.”

By changing their own source code, The Internet Archive is concealing an “Excluded Error” message and in effect hiding the fact that they are violating their own Exclusion Policy.  This message would likely lead a user of the Wayback Machine to find out how and why a webpage could or would be excluded; and in doing so they would then learn that there is a distinction between a webpage being Excluded and Blocked and that the NYS BOE is simultaneously Blocking access to webpages as well.

The Internet Archive Exclusion Policy is also guided by the

The American Library Association's Library Bill of Rights:

“Materials should not be proscribed or removed because of partisan or doctrinal disapproval.”

Blocking previous versions of a government website that previously stated the requirements to be President of the United States require a candidate to be a Natural Born Citizen when the current occupant of the White House is not a Natural Born Citizen and therefore a Usurper to that office would assuredly constitute a “partisan” action.

The conspiracy to subvert the Natural Born Citizen requirement set forth by the Founders in Article 2 of the Constitution as evidenced in this new revelation implicating an institution with such vast reach and influence should shock the collective conscience of our nation.  The full breadth and depth of this Constitutional Crisis is unknown for it is still unfolding even as we find ourselves ripe in another election cycle for the 2012 elections.  Likewise, “Justiagate” recently uncovered by Attorney Leo Donofrio exposing the sabotaging of 25 Supreme Court Opinions in order to remove references to “Minor v. Happersett”, the only US Supreme Court decision to directly construe the natural-born citizen clause in relation to a citizenship issue; should be viewed as egregious disloyalty to the fidelity of the Republic no less considering Justia CEO Tim Stanley was associated with “Obama For America 2008.”  According to Donofrio,  "personnel may also be guilty of violating 18 U.S.C. 1018 by intentionally passing off tampered versions of US Supreme Court opinions as if they were official versions published by the US Supreme Court."

Regardless of political ideology, all Americans should demand the Constitution be upheld in its entirety and the news media begin to report on the issue of Presidential eligibility with the forthrightness and unbiased due-diligence it deserves.

An unconstitutional putative president is a matter of national security.

A fundamental sense of right and wrong has been leveraged against special interests at the expense of the Rule of Law.

Superman: I'm here to fight for truth, and justice, and the American way.

Lois Lane: You're going to end up fighting every elected official in this country! 

Sadly, Lois Lane was right.  We have been fighting every elected official and public officer in the country going on 3 years now demanding they honor their oath of office and uphold the Rule of Law.

Hopefully when Christopher Strunk goes before Justice Schack again on Tuesday,

Truth and Justice will prevail.

If not, “The American Way” can’t be far behind.

Read more »